This is a public Forum  publicRSS

Forum post

    Grant Stephens
    Features in development
    Forum post posted August 22, 2010 by Grant Stephens, last edited February 9, 2012
    567 Views, 11 Comments
    Title:
    Features in development
    Post:

    Now FMGo has been out for a bit I am sure there have been alot of feature requests flooding in. I was wondering if a dev could make a sticky regarding features that are in the process of being implemented and estimated availiability dates. I know a few people are waiting for features such as signature capture and I would hate to waste hours finishing development in FMtouch only to have it released the next day in FMGo.

    Cheers

    Answer

    • James Pierson
      posted August 22, 2010 by James Pierson  Permalink

      Hello. I would like to second this idea.

      It would be nice to have an idea as to what new features are in development and an approximate eta for their release.

      Of particular interest to myself and many others I'm sure is the ability to enter data all day using the FM file on the local device (iPhone) while offline, then sync to a remote FM Server later when a connnection is available.

      I am no sales and marketing expert but I can imagine that once this feature is available it will increase the demand for FM Server. I know our relatively small company would purchase FM Server and many copies of FM GO if it would eliminate or greatly reduce the flood of Excel attachments and or faxed forms from the field.

      Thanks

    • filemakergarage
      posted August 23, 2010 by filemakergarage  Permalink

      +1

      Feature requests should be made public, so they can be reviewed and may be commented on and rated.

      Nils

    • TSGal
      posted August 23, 2010 by TSGal  Permalink

      All:

      Thank you for your posts.

      You are free to post and discuss suggestions.  However, the best place to enter suggestions and make your voice heard is into our Feature Requests web form at:

      http://www.filemaker.com/company/contact/feature_request.html

      These suggestions are monitored and read by both our Development and Product Management departments who discuss and consider these suggestions for a future release.

      FileMaker, Inc. does not discuss future releases.

      TSGal
      FileMaker, Inc.

    • Grant Stephens
      posted August 23, 2010 by Grant Stephens  Permalink

      While I can understand that discussing future release plans in public forums may give competitors an advantage, I hate to point out that the competition already has most of these features. Surely you are able to give us an indication that you are actively working on these requests or even just a 'we will be releasing an update shortly to include some popular feature requests'... Could you could explain why "FileMaker, Inc. does not discuss future releases."? I am sure it would be a great service to the FM community (and to FileMaker Inc) to more proactively include them in your development cycle.

    • TSGal
      posted August 24, 2010 by TSGal  Permalink

      Grant Stephens:

      Thank you for your post.

      I won't go into all the reasons why we don't discuss future products, but FileMaker, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Apple Computer, and they set policy.  Keep in mind that Apple Computer is a publicly traded company, and any discussion of future products could be viewed by the Security and Exchange Commission as a way to manipulate the stock price.

      On a separate note, there are many people outside of FileMaker, Inc. (including forum members) under non-disclosure agreements that contribute to our "development cycle".

      TSGal
      FileMaker, Inc.

    • Grant Stephens
      posted August 24, 2010 by Grant Stephens  Permalink

      So what did the Security and Exchange Commission have to say when apple announced to the world it would be releasing the next Iphone revision or Ipad? Point taken though... We will just wait and check the app store daily until something pops up...

    • CALL-151
      posted August 25, 2010 by CALL-151  Permalink

      Like it or not, the basis of this policy is understandable and immutable. The explanation provided by TSGal says it all. I think what many are looking for is some assurance that there's a solid commitment to grow the Go platform, beyond just tweaking a version 1 release. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the initial product, and the tremendous potential it represents. But before embracing development of "Go specific" solutions, many would like to know that there's a development plan and that this isn't just a pet project that someone pushed through which will now languish on the back burner.

    • TSGal
      posted August 25, 2010 by TSGal  Permalink

      CALL-151:

      Great question.  I've been talking this over with my boss and his boss.

      The bottom line is we still cannot discuss future products.  However, I can tell you we are excited and pleased with the reaction to FileMaker Go.  If you go to the Apple Store, you will see several 5-star reviews.

      TSGal
      FileMaker, Inc.

    • CALL-151
      posted August 26, 2010 by CALL-151  Permalink

      Understood. Hopefully, the pace and content of future updates will ease apprehensions.

    • jjfcpa
      posted August 30, 2010 by jjfcpa  Permalink
      Instead of posting what will be updated in the next release, why not just list the recommendations that have been made so far in the order of preference by the user community? A short disclaimer that indicates Filemaker will not necessarily be implementing the recommendations in any future release should cover FM and Apple's butt. But this would be extremely useful to the user community since it will provide us with a much easier way to see what other users need and want without having to scour the various websites about Filemaker. Perhaps some enterprising young developer out there will create a website where we can post our requests, he can rank them, and then FM, Inc. can just go there to see what's most requested. Will this suffice in keeping the SEC off Apple's behind??? Filing out the request form is a dark hole for most of us. Heck, I can't even remember what I've requested from one day to the next. And I'd sure like to jump behind some of those who are requesting for some sort of syncing capabilities.